Legal Eagles, Raging Bulls: Against the Ropes Vs I am Sam

Against the Ropes is a mess of a melodrama, brazen enough to bill itself as inspired by the story of Jackie Kallen, a journalist and mother of two, who became the first female manager in the world of professional boxing.PDVD_010Played here by Meg Ryan, as a modern-day single female and PR lackey, Jackie is a ball of furious ambition, who stumbles across Luther Shaw (Omar Epps), a raw talent with world class potential. Luring renowned trainer Felix (Charles Dutton) out of retirement, she gambles everything on Luther, quitting her job to manage him full time. Brushing aside mobbed-up promoters and opponents alike, Luther proceeds to tear through the undercards to title contention in just 15 minutes of carefully choreographed screen time.
HBOMeg, dressed like Barbarella and affecting a ludicrous, husky Detroit accent, is a knockout to look at, but the producers are so intent on celebrating Jackie that the film neglects the basics. As her protégé “Lethal” Luther Shaw, Omar Epps is a paper thin pugilist whose backstory is revealed over salads in one short sequence.Felix Luther and JackieDirector Dutton, does deliver one great scene in the third act that resonates more deeply, when Jackie’s and Luther’s ambitions conflict and she makes a thoughtless remark that cuts him to the core. It’s a wonderful moment and it suggests that this film could’ve amounted to much more than a formulaic Hollywood tale of plucky underdogs defying the odds.
Teetering on High heelsAfter having its release date delayed by almost two years, Against the Ropes bombed at the box office in 2004. Watching it again I felt like I’d taken as much punishment as the boxers. Then came the Big Fight, a standing ovation, and bang, I actually found myself moved by the pay-off.

I am SamAfter Against the Ropes floored me with a late sucker punch, I am Sam backed me into a corner, mainly because it’s rare to watch Michelle Pfeiffer play fourth fiddle in her own movie. If you watch I am Sam with your head, you’re likely to end up groggy from the barrage of emotional haymakers being hurled at you. If you watch it with your heart however, you may find the ending cathartic.
Hair and High HeelsSean Penn, playing the eponymous Sam, a Beatles-loving, single father with a mental age of 7, completely transforms his speech patterns and body language for the role. It’s a deeply committed piece of acting, with no single moment where he drops his guard. The very authenticity of his performance guarantees the rest of the cast will look like journeymen in comparison, with the exception of Dianne Wiest, whose talent far exceeds her cameo as Sam’s agoraphobic neighbour.Product PlacementYou can’t help but root for Sam Dawson as he fights against the social system for custody of his 7-year-old daughter, Lucy (Dakota Fanning). In his corner we find highly-strung, uber lawyer Rita Harrison (Michelle Pfeiffer), taking the case on a pro bono basis, to prove to her colleagues that she’s more than just a PR-hungry, morally questionable, Porsche-driving schyster.High Powered RitaMichelle in full, head-turning, ultra-glossy mode, gets to kick down a door while wearing a pair of high heeled, knee-length suede boots, but for all Rita’s showboating, the film never comes close to making a credible case for Sam being allowed to raise his daughter alone. The alternative option of a foster mother (Laura Dern) and a stable family, is counted out. All you need is love.Pfeiffer and DianeAs I mentioned at the opening bell, this isn’t a role Michelle was born to play. If Meg Ryan’s blend of confidence and cleavage in Against the Ropes feels slightly off-kilter, Michelle has never looked more uncomfortable. Rita Harrison could have been a contender, but then again so could Jackie Kallen, whose outrageous outfits were originally due to be filled by La Pfeiffer.Michelle Pfeiffer (Titles)If Michelle and Meg could’ve swapped roles I have no idea who would have done the better job. I only know that as the judges deliver their verdict on this bout between brassy exhibitionists, neither comes away looking like a winner.

Advertisements

7 Comments

Filed under Review

7 responses to “Legal Eagles, Raging Bulls: Against the Ropes Vs I am Sam

  1. RB

    What a great post Paul, bringing together two gems from the past. I’ve never seen Against the Ropes but plan to now.
    Pfeiffer fan that I am, I did see “I am Sam” in the theatres and was absolutely blown away. Best stuff ever seen out of Sean Penn, and well, don’t shoot me but I thought our Pfeiffer just nailed her difficult role. Nailed it to the wall. How do you portray flinty and career drive, together with the heart and the integrity to focus on what matters? How do you portray a mind sharp enough to identify what the legally significant facts are and what to do about it? I almost thought Michelle went to law school to prepare for this role.

  2. Paul S,

    I scarcely remember I am Sam…seemed like a Rainman rip-off in a handful of ways. Sometimes the vibe is just off despite high caliber actors. I’ll check out Against the Ropes sometime…never heard of it. At the beginning, I thought your were tumbling another fantasy picture together!

    Cheers on your great perspectives / reviews…I’ve been absent for a bit, good catching up with you. 🙂

    RR

  3. Dakota Fanning was possibly the only child actor ever who could hold her own opposite Sean Penn!

  4. Jay

    I hope someone calls ME ultra-glossy one day!
    Great reviews, fun pitting them against each other.

  5. Michelle’s performance in “I am Sam,” is easily one of the best supporting turns in recent memory. Laura Dern should have watched that and learned how to act.

  6. Two things about “I Am Sam” stay with me all these years after seeing it. The first is Dakota Fanning’s performance. She was a revelation. Quite simply, it’s the best performance I’ve ever seen by a child actor and better than what’s typically on display from most adult actors. Second was the reaction it raised from the person with whom I was watching it. She had to leave the room in tears because the raw emotion between father and daughter resonated so deeply with her past. It wasn’t just cheap sentimentality. It was real and it was profound.

    You’re probably right about the reality of the case. I was willing to suspend my skepticism, however, probably based on the heart in the performances of Penn and Fanning. Ms. Pfeiffer was good as she generally is, but next to those two, she was almost inconspicuous. No small feat.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s